<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Day 1: Friday, November 18</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts - Amherst All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18</link>
<description>Recent Events in Day 1: Friday, November 18</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 22:06:01 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - The Influence of Grain Size on the Formation of Natural Gas Hydrate</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/32</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/32</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Gas hydrates are crystalline compounds commonly found beneath Arctic permafrost and in Marine sediments along continental margins. They are thought to play an important role in global climate change, marine hazards, and as an alternative energy source. Reservoir grain size can directly affect the quantity and type of hydrate that is formed. Formation within the sediment is dependent on a number of factors including the interaction between the guest gas molecule and the surrounding water molecules along with the thermodynamic boundary conditions of the system. Once nucleation has occurred the distribution of hydrate is directly related to the pore size of the sediment itself. Hydrate preferentially forms in coarser grained sediment and tends to be pore filling, whereas, hydrate formation within finer-grained sediments results in more complex hydrate distributions such as nodules, lenses, and layers. In this study we examine the grain size of hydrate bearing sediment from marine and Arctic locations and discuss the thermodynamic and nucleation characteristics of gas hydrate in coarse- versus fine-grained sediment.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Russel Wilcox-Cline et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay of Liquid Xenon</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/31</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/31</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We report on research and development carried out in the UMass EXO group to study scintillation of liquid Xenon towards optimizing the design and performance for a future EXO experiment. We are developing a test setup for APDs to understand the effects of temperature on the gain of the sensors and calibrate them for future use. A separate setup has been designed to qualitatively discern how well different materials reflect 178nm light, the wavelength of Xenon scintillation, in an attempt to effectively modify the structure of EXO. This involves constructing a liquefaction cell and purification manifold to produce maximally clean liquid Xenon for a testing environment. The end results of these investigations will be used to make the full scale EXO project more efficient to increase the probability of discovering neutrino-less double beta decay. To understand what we will see from detectors at EXO 200, the UMass EXO group has constructed a vacuum system to isolate APDs from any disturbances, whether they be foreign molecules or electrical interference. We aim to analyze signals given from known sources in order to further familiarize ourselves with expected and unexpected results.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Cameron Mackeen et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - Study of a Detector to Count a Cs-136 Source in Xenon</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/30</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/30</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>I will discuss the current status of my tests characterizing a detector to be used for R&D for the Enriched Xenon Observatory (EXO) to count an irradiated Cs-136 source from xenon cells.  The source is produced at the TUNL lab by proton-irradiating gaseous xenon.  The apparatus consists of a sodium iodide crystal coupled to a photomultiplier tube (PMT); the signal is fed to a high-speed digitizer card that is read and controlled by LabVIEW.  I have performed extensive tests on the digitizer card with respect to the sampling rate, voltage offsets, resolution, and linearity, with the objective of understanding its properties. The Cs-136 source will be used at UMass as a tool to study the behavior of the barium ion in liquid xenon, with the ultimate goal of increasing the sensitivity of future beta-decay experiments.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kelly Malone et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - Temperature Dependence of Helium Diffusion Through Common Epoxies</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/29</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/29</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Helium gas at room temperature is known to diffuse through the epoxies commonly used in various low temperature apparatus, which can complicate leak detection. The helium flux typically decreases with decreasing temperature. We have measured the flux of helium that passes though thin sections of as-cast clear Stycast 1266, Stycast 2850FT (black) and TRA-BOND 2151 (blue) epoxies as a function of temperature in the range 130K < T < 300K. We analyze the data to create normalized (to constant sample thickness and pressure differential) data for comparison. We report the preliminary temperature-dependent fluxes we have measured, which show significant differences among the epoxies studied.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Dylan Lovinger et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - Darkside-50: A Collaborative Search for Dark Matter</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/28</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/28</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This poster presentation that will cover the basics of the Darkside  (<em><em>Depleted Argon</em></em> cryogenic Scintillation and Ionization Detection) project, including what dark matter is and how we know it exists.  It will also address the different methods other collaborations use to try to detect dark matter and special emphasis will be placed on the methods Darkside uses: scintillation and ionization.  The presentation will also look at the design of the detector as it currently stands and a summary of how it will work.  It will address the fairly universal problem of weeding out background signals in the detector by first addressing what those signals are, and discussing ways to minimize them or disregard them.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Gary Forster</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session D1: The Only Way Of Knowing</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/27</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/27</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:45:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>As of today there are 7 billion people on  this planet; according to the wireless industry 5 billion of them have  cell phones. It's possible to call anyone on Earth with a 2-ounce pocket  mobile. The knowledge behind this politically-powerful technology did  not come from sacred texts or government offices. The only way of  knowing is by scientific observation and testing. In theory, the public  learns from the media. As I will show, the media is not a reliable  source.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert L. Park</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - A delayed choice quantum eraser experiment that involves no delayed choice, no quantum eraser, and no complementarity</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/26</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/26</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:16:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Kim et al published an article, ``A delayed choice quantum eraser,'' in 1999  that appeared to show many remarkable things, including that the choice of  observable erases the interference fringes that were previously recorded in  a double slit experiment. However, the solidity of those conclusions hinges  on whether or not quantum mechanics provides the only available explanation  of that experiment. By thinking outside the box we have a different way of  viewing that experiment. We find there is no delayed choice in the Kim  experiment of 1999. There is no quantum eraser. What appears to be a delayed  choice and a quantum eraser involve a different understanding of Kim's  experiment than the one we favor. We also show how the double slit  experiment can be understood with local cause and effect, and without  complementarity.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jeffrey Boyd</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - The new PhysTEC program at Boston University</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/25</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/25</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 20:04:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The Boston University Physics Department was  recently awarded a three-year grant from the Physics Teacher Education  Coalition (PhysTEC). PhysTEC's main aims are to improve the education of   future physics teachers, and to increase the number of qualified physics  teachers in the school system. Although there have been over 20  PhysTEC-funded sites across the country, BU is the first PhysTEC site in  New England. Our goals with this poster are to raise awareness about  PhysTEC, and to talk about what we are doing and what we plan to do at  BU with our PhysTEC funding. A key part of the PhysTEC program is the  teacher-in-residence (TIR), an experienced physics teacher who comes to  campus for a year to promote physics teaching as a profession and to  lend  their experience to education-related efforts. Our first TIR is Juliet  Jenkins. The poster will discuss Ms. Jenkins' role in the Department of  Physics and in the School of Education as we move forward with new  efforts to promote teaching, including a Learning Assistant program, a  pilot studio section of one of our introductory physics courses, and a  new education course that allows undergraduate students to observe  teachers in the classroom.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Juliet Jenkins et al.</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session  - Physics of Green Energy \&amp; Fundamentals of Nuclear Processes</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/24</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/24</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:52:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This poster presents topics in outline form  of two courses offered by the physics department at Springfield  Technical Community College, Springfield MA.  These are both four  credit, three hour laboratory, transferable courses that fulfill science  distribution requirement.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Margaret E. McCarthy</author>


</item>


<item>
<title>Session C1: APS, AAPT, and SPS Poster Session - Physics or Mathematics Preparation - which is the better predictor of performance in a first, calculus-based college physics course?</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/23</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov18/23</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 19:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Data spanning fifteen semesters and including more than 1200 students showed  far less than the anticipated difference in performance between students  with quite diverse levels of physics preparation. Students ranged from those  with no prior physics course work to those with two or more years of HS  physics and prior courses in college physics. Less prior physics training  frequently coincided with better performance in the first calculus-based  course. Preparation in mathematics, on the other hand, appeared critically  important; students at the extremes of the math preparation spectrum were  concentrated at the corresponding extremes of the physics grade  distribution.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Norma Chase</author>


</item>



</channel>
</rss>
