<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Climate Change and the Future of Nuclear Power</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 University of Massachusetts - Amherst All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower</link>
<description>Recent documents in Climate Change and the Future of Nuclear Power</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:27:10 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>









<item>
<title>Session J2: AAPT Tutorial: Anthropogenic Global Warming: Anthropogenic Global Warming--Illuminating Some of Its Scientific and Methodological Flaws</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/55</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/55</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 14:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Laurence I. Gould</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session J1: AAPT Tutorial: Anthropogenic Global Warming: Data Supporting Anthropogenic Global Warming: Balancing Ecology with Economics</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/54</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/54</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 13:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul H. Carr</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session G1: Plenary Session: Nuclear Power and Climate Change - TerraPower&apos;s Traveling Wave Reactor</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/53</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/53</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:40:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>TerraPower is moving forward with detailed  plans for a sustainable, economic, and safe nuclear reactor. The  Traveling Wave Reactor (TWR) -- a reactor in the 500-megawatt electric  range - uses unique core physics to initiate a breed and burn wave which  can be completely sustained in fertile material. This process allows  the TWR to convert depleted uranium waste into usable fuel as the  reactor operates, providing a sustainable base-load power source.  TerraPower is the first company to create a practical engineering  embodiment of this previously studied concept thanks to a powerful  advanced reactor modeling interface, developed in-house, which enables  the analysis of traveling wave reactor technology in a way that has not  been possible before. This presentation will provide more detail about  the origins of the TWR, the project's current status as well as some of  the safety differences between TWRs and currently operating light water  reactors.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Tyler Ellis</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session G1: Plenary Session: Nuclear Power and Climate Change - Climate v. Climate Alarm</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/52</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/52</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:50:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The underlying physics of climate contains  important elements that are widely agreed on though frequently  misunderstood. In this lecture, the basic physics of greenhouse warming  are simply described. It will be shown that the dynamic mixing of the  troposphere is essential to the mechanism. It will further be shown that  there is nothing intrinsically alarming in the basic physics. Alarm  depends critically on the assertion that the climate system is dominated  by large positive feedbacks that greatly amplify such warming as may be  due to increasing CO2 alone. The nature of possible feedbacks will be  described, and the conditions for observationally determining such  feedbacks will be explained. It will be seen that the feedback factors,  themselves, can be subject to fluctuations, so that large positive  feedbacks could occasionally lead to instability. A variety of attempts  to evaluate such feedbacks will be described. Some will be shown to be  clearly incorrect. The remaining approaches suggest that feedbacks are  small and even negative, suggesting little basis for alarm.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Richard S. Lindzen</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session G1: Plenary Session: Nuclear Power and Climate Change - When Sciences Fails Society: Toxicology&apos;s 20th Century Legacy</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/51</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/51</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 10:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This presentation provides an assessment of  hormesis, a dose-response concept that is characterized by a low-dose  stimulation and a high-dose inhibition. It will trace the historical  foundations of hormesis, its quantitative features and mechanistic  foundations, and its risk assessment implications. It will be argued  that the hormetic dose response is the most fundamental dose response,  significantly outcompeting other leading dose-response models in  large-scale, head-to-head evaluations used by regulatory agencies such  as the EPA and FDA. The hormetic dose response is highly generalizable,  being independent of biological model, endpoint measured, chemical  class, physical agent (e.g., radiation) and inter-individual  variability. Hormesis also provides a framework for the study and  assessment of chemical mixtures, incorporating the concept of additivity  and synergism. Because the hormetic biphasic dose response represents a  general pattern of biological responsiveness, it is expected that it  will become progressively more significant within toxicological  evaluation and chemical and radiation risk assessment practices as well  as having numerous biomedical applications. Particular application will  be directed towards how hormesis may affect the risk assessment process  for chemicals and ionizing radiation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Edward J. Calabrese</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: The Horizon of the Universe could be the source of the Electroweak Force</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/50</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/50</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:12:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In Physics the problem of observers and observed plays a central  role.  A Blue Photon in is created, in one observers reference  frame, that is far from another observer, at the Horizon of the  his reference frame, when it reaches him it is a red photon,  because there is a third observer present and that is the photon  itself. The photon carries information with itself in its  travels, as to where the time-normal was where it was created.  If one agrees that the time normal points away from the observer  at the Horizon, photons coming from there are red shifted, this  is true of Black Hole Horizons as well.  What about photons  coming from over the Horizon?  They go to radio frequency, but  then are Blue Shifted using the same paradigm. The only way to  Blue Shift a photon in this way is to give it mass and all of  the trappings of mass, like charge. This is a particular type of  Blue Shifting where the time vector points in an unusual  direction. This CPT violation is commonly seen in the  Electroweak Force, as at the Horizon the time vector only points  out, away from the observer and is no longer part of 4  dimensional space-time.  This symmetry breaking at the Horizon  causes the Electromagnetic Force to become the Electroweak  Force, and a Gauge is establish that is easily recognized. Using  this idea a General Procedure for the Construction of Matter  from Energy can be written.  The easier parts are seen in a  slightly curved environment like the Sun.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Richard Kriske</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: For AAPT: Teaching the Wave Mechanics of McLeods&apos; Stringy Electron, Explicit Nucleons, and Through-the-Earth Projections of Constellations&apos; Stick Figures</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/49</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/49</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>McLeods' NEF11{\#}22 submission is from their same-title INVITED  presentation at Frontiers in Optics 2011, San Jose, CA. It shows how Hooke's  law for electron, proton and neutron strings build electromagnetic waves  from strings. These are composed of spirally linked, parallel, north-pole  oriented, neutrino and antineutrino strings, stable because of magnetic  repulsions. Their Dumbo Proton is antineutrino-scissor cut, and compressed  in the vicinity of a neutron star, where electrostatic marriage occurs with  a neutrino-scissor cut, and compressed, electron, so a Mickey Neutron  emerges. Strings then predict electron charge is \textbf{\textit{-- 1/3 e}},  Dumbo P is 25 {\%} longer than Mickey N, and Hooke says relaxing springs  fuel three separate inflations after each Big Bang oscillation. Gravity can  be strings longitudinally linked. Einstein says Herman Grid's black  diagonals prove human vision reads its information from algebraically-signed  electromagnetic field diffraction patterns known by ray-tracing, not  difficult Spatial Fourier Transformation. High-schoolers understand its  application to Wave Mechanics, and agree that positive-numbered  probabilities do not enter to possibly displease God. Stick figure  constellations detected, like Phoenix, Leo, Canis Major, and especially  Orion, fool some observers into false beliefs in things like UFHumanoids, or  Kokopelli, Pele and Pamola!</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David Matthew McLeod</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: Hermann Grid&apos;s Dark Diagonals Disprove QM&apos;s ``Beliefs,&apos;&apos; Reveal Stringy Electron, Nucleons, Stick Figure Constellations</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/48</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/48</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:48:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Vision detects electric field amplitude information from spatial Fourier  transforms, SFTs, of object space. Optics states: at focal, not image,  surfaces, for Hermann, and pincushion, grids. Von B\'{e}k\'{e}sy's skin  pressure experiments prove brain circuitry interprets focal diffraction  patterns as inverse SFTs. This knocks out QM beliefs, enhanced by  Schr\"{o}dinger's electron assertions. Mc Leods' electron string model,  based on a neutrino in chiral embrace with a parallel, magnetically  repellant, antineutrino, transversely aligned in continuous pairings along  each wave-string's closure. This generalized, in Recife, PE, Brazil, to the  three-ring, up quark, down quark, up quark, of our \textbf{\textit{Dumbo  Proton}}, underpass-overpass string. Cut by an antineutrino scissor, and  merged with our compressed, neutrino-cut electron, a \textbf{\textit{Mickey  Neutron}} with over- or underpass pairs only, emerges, is unstable, and is  of \textbf{\textit{4/3 e}} string units length. \textbf{\textit{Dumbo  Proton}} is \textbf{\textit{5/3 e}} units; this string theory predicts a  \textbf{\textit{Trinitarian Electron}}, with charge \textbf{\textit{-1/3  e}}, whatever phase, Standing Wave Up, SWU, Traveling Wave, TW, or Standing  Wave Down, SWD. It explains solar neutrino flux factor 3 shortfall.  Camcorders capture this electron at gigapower \textbf{\textit{n}} values.  \textbf{\textit{Peruvian Nazcans recorded high energy, composite  nucleon trajectories for us, as ``applied optical (VISION) physicists.'' }}</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Roger David McLeod et al.</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: A non-QM explanation of Jacques&apos; (2007) ``Wheeler gedanken experiment with delayed choice,&apos;&apos; without delayed choice</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/47</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/47</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:36:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The publication in Science in 2007 of Jacques et al ``Experimental  realization of Wheeler's delayed-choice gedanken experiment,'' appears to  demonstrate many counter-intuitive ideas. The solidity of those conclusions  depends on whether quantum mechanics (QM) provides the ONLY available  explanation of the experiment. By thinking outside the box we have arrived  at a different explanation of that experiment. QM is the box outside of  which we think, not because of criticism of QM, but in order to explore an  unconventional viewpoint. Our explanation is based on elementary waves. We  find no delayed choice. What appears to be delayed choice is an illusion. We  also find local cause and effect. This does not prove that our way of  thinking is correct. It simply means that we propose an alternative  explanation of the experiment that does not lead to all those  counter-intuitive ideas.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jeffrey Boyd</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: Hadronic Parity Violation</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/46</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/46</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:24:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>For 50 years the field of hadronic parity  violation has been unresolved.  Since the 1980's the standard  theoretical framework for hadronic parity violation has been the DDH  model.  However, discrepancies between the DDH model and experiment have  called the use of this model into question.  At low energies a new  model independent analysis of hadronic parity violation can be carried  out via pionless effective field theory.  With the use of pionless  effective field theory and new precision experiments, focusing on  systems with $\mathrm{A} \leq 4$ in order to eliminate nuclear physics  uncertainties, the field of hadronic parity violation at low energies  will finally be understood.  This talk will give an overview of the  theory and possible future experiments in this old yet still exciting  field.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Jared Vanasse</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: Density Matrices in the Quenching of Positronium by Electron Exchange</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/45</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/45</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:12:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Electron exchange in a single collision  between \textit{ortho} positronium and a target with one unpaired  electron can result in the conversion (quenching) of the long-lived  \textit{ortho} positronium into the short-lived \textit{para}  positronium. The probabilities of forming \textit{para} and\textit{  ortho} positronium after the collision are calculated using  angular-momentum coupling and density-matrix techniques. The fraction of  the initial \textit{ortho} positronium that is converted to  \textit{para} positronium (quenching fraction)  is given in terms of complex scattering amplitudes labeled with total  electron spin. Quenching fractions are obtained for polarized and  unpolarized targets, with and without detection of the spin of the  target after the collision.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sudha Swaminathan et al.</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F4: Theory: New insights into the nucleon structure through bag model studies of the energy momentum tensor</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/44</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Information about the energy momentum tensor of the nucleon  can in principle be inferred from studies of generalized parton  distribution functions which enter the description of hard  exclusive reactions. Presently the data do not yet allow to  deduce model-independent information, and results from effective  models are of great interest. We present first results on the  energy momentum tensor of the nucleon from the MIT bag model.  In particular, also the bag model predicts the constant d1  to be negative in agreement with results from lattice QCD,  and other approaches.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Matthew Neubelt et al.</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F3: Cosmology, Theory: Visualizing the Superposition Process</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/43</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 09:00:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We demonstrate the dynamic evolution of  superposition effects using two intersecting beams of electromagnetic  radiation, to underscore the importance of visualizing interaction  processes. Recordable fringes within the volume of superposition have  time evolving bright fringe patterns, because the two superposed  E-vectors oscillate through zero values while staying locked in phase.  If a detector registers steady, stable bright fringes, it must do so by  time integration. The QM recipe to model energy exchange by taking the  square modulus of the sum of the complex amplitudes has this time  integration built into it. We also discuss the importance of assigning  proper physical processes to the mathematical relationships whenever  possible: the algebraic symbols should represent physical parameters of  the interactants and the mathematical operators connecting the symbols  should represent allowed physical interaction processes and the guiding  force.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael Ambroselli et al.</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F3: Cosmology, Theory: The Universe is not expanding</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/42</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/42</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:48:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Plasma redshift cosmology is a new cosmology  that is far superior to the conventional Big-Bang cosmology.  It shows  that the universe is not expanding, and that there is no accelerated  expansion.  Closer analyses show that the equations leading to the  Big-Bang are wrong or inadequate as they do not take properly into  account: the dielectric constant, essential quantum effects, and  important effects of the hot plasma, including the plasma frequency in  intergalactic space. Plasma redshift cosmology explains the observed  solar redshifts, the redshifts of stars, galaxies, quasars and the  intergalactic plasma. Comparison with measured solar redshifts shows  that Gravitational redshifts of optical lines reverse as the photons  move from the Sun to the Earth. This shows that the optical photons are  gravitationally repelled and not attracted as surmised in the Big-Bang  cosmology.  This shows that as star-matter concentrates at the center of  galaxies, it turns so hot that the thermal collisions transform old  star-matter to photons and primordial matter. This way the universe can  renew itself for ever. The primordial matter can diffuse away from the  center and is often seen surrounding the galaxy-centers.  No Dark  Energy, Dark matter, or Black Holes are needed to explain the  observations</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ari Brynjolfsson</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F3: Cosmology, Theory: Blogging as a Research Tool</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/41</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/41</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:36:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>I work on variations of the Maxwell Lagrange  density using quaternions and hypercomplex products of covariant  4-derivatives and 4-potentials. The hope is to unify gravity with the  symmetries found in the standard model. It is difficult for someone  outside academia to get constructive criticism.  I have chosen to blog once a week at Science20.com since March, 2011.  Over thirty blogs have been generated, most getting more than a thousand  views (high mark is 5k for ``Why Quantum Mechanics is Wierd''). The  tools used for web and video blogging will be reviewed.  A discussion of my efforts to represent electroweak symmetry with  quaternions convinced me I was in error. Instead, my hope is to exploit  the observation that U(1) is formally a subgroup of SU(2). A battle over  gauge symmetry may be reviewe</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Douglas Sweetser</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F3: Cosmology, Theory: Relativity on Rotated Graph Paper</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/40</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/40</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:24:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We present visual calculations in special  relativity using spacetime diagrams drawn on graph paper that has been  rotated by 45 degrees. The rotated lines represent lightlike directions  in Minkowski spacetime, and the boxes in the grid (called light-clock  diamonds) represent ticks of an inertial observer's lightclock. We show  that many quantitative results can be read off a spacetime diagram by  counting boxes, using a minimal amount of algebra.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Salgado</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F3: Cosmology, Theory: Understanding Cosmological Probes of the Dark Side: Computational Studies of Type Ia Supernovae</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/38</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/38</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:12:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Each Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) event has very  nearly the same intrinsic brightness regardless of where or when in the  universe it exploded. Consequently, SNe Ia provide us with standard  candles which have enabled precision cosmological measurements leading  to the discovery of the acceleration of the expansion of the universe,  and of dark energy -- fundamental work recognized by this year's Nobel  prize committee.   However, despite these advances, the nature of the progenitors which  give rise to SNe Ia, and of the explosion mechanism itself, remain  mysterious. While evidence strongly suggests that the progenitors  consist of at least one near-Chandrasekhar mass white dwarf in a binary  system, both the type of companion, and the precise total mass of the  system (either near-critical, or sub- or super-Chandra) are being  actively investigated. I will discuss recent computational simulations  which have begun to unravel the mystery of these remarkable explosions  which probe the dark side of the cosmos.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Robert Fisher et al.</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F2: Energy, Climate, Nuclear Medicine: A Network Model and Computational Approach for the Mo-99 Supply Chain for Nuclear Medicine</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/37</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/37</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:48:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Technetium-99m, produced from the decay of  Molybdenum-99, is the most commonly used radioisotope for medical  imaging, specifically in cardiac and cancer diagnostics. The MO-99 is  produced in a small number of reactors and is processed and distributed  worldwide. We have developed a tractable network model and computational  approach for the design and redesign of the MO-99 supply chains. This  topic is of special relevance to medical physics given the product's  widespread use and the aging of the nuclear reactors where it is  produced. This generalized network model, for which we derived formulae  for the arc and path multipliers that capture the underlying physics of  radioisotope decay, includes total operational cost minimization, and  the minimization of cost associated with nuclear waste disposal, coupled  with capacity investment (or disinvestment) costs. Its solution yields  the optimal link capacities as well as the optimal MO-99 flows so that  demand at the medical facilities is satisfied. We illustrate the  framework with a Western Hemisphere case study. The framework provides  the foundation for further empirical research and the basis for the  modeling and analysis of supply chain networks for other very  time-sensitive medical products.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ladimer Nagurney et al.</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F2: Energy, Climate, Nuclear Medicine: Is Earth&apos;s sea level currently rising? If so are humans responsible?</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/36</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/36</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:36:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper presents the experimental evidence concerning sea level change.  A historical perspective is also offered.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Peter Glanz</author>


</item>








<item>
<title>Session F: Contributed Oral Papers – F2: Energy, Climate, Nuclear Medicine: Biochar As a Renewable Energy Source</title>
<link>http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/35</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://scholarworks.umass.edu/climate_nuclearpower/2011/nov19/35</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 08:12:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Biochar is a form of charcoal prepared by  heating biomass in limited air. It is porous and has high surface area,  maintaining much of the morphology of the biomass. The heat for its  preparation arises primarily from burning volatiles emitted upon  heating.  About half the chemical energy in the biomass is contained in  the biochar, about 40\% is used for the conversion, and about 10\% may  be used as a local heat source. The biochar can serve as a soil additive  where it acts as a template for the growth of bacteria and fungi which  then lead to improved growth of biomass by as much as several hundred  percent.  It remains inert in the soil for many years. Thus, it  sequesters the carbon, originally coming from the carbon dioxide  absorbed during the photosynthesis occurring during the growth of the  biomass. Its use reduces fertilizer and water needs and to pollution  arising from the run-off of fertilizer and emission of noxious vapors.  Its use is best done at a local level, close to sources of biomass from  farm and forest waste. The Pioneer Valley Biochar Initiative along with  the Center of Agriculture of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst is  promoting the use of biochar on local farms which reduces their  dependence on energy arising from fossil fuel and nuclear sources.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Richard Stein</author>


</item>






</channel>
</rss>
