Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.

Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.

Author ORCID Identifier

N/A

AccessType

Open Access Dissertation

Document Type

dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Program

Psychology

Year Degree Awarded

2017

Month Degree Awarded

February

First Advisor

Caren Rotello

Subject Categories

Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Response bias is a component of decision making that can be defined as the general willingness to respond a certain way. For example, in recognition memory, one can have a response bias towards responding that a test item has been previously studied, or in reasoning, one can have a response bias towards responding that a conclusion is logically valid. However, not all individuals have the same response bias. Indeed, there is some evidence that response bias is a stable cognitive trait in memory that differs across individuals (Kantner & Lindsay, 2012, 2014). One predictor of this trait may be cognitive ability, since it appears to predict response bias in memory (Zhu et al., 2010) and in reasoning (e.g., Handley & Trippas, 2015). While memory and reasoning have similar decision making components and may be very related (Heit & Hayes, 2011; Heit, Rotello, & Hayes, 2012), this experiment is the first to test whether cognitive ability predicts response bias in both tasks. Experiment 1 showed that higher cognitive ability participants were more conservative than lower cognitive ability participants in reasoning, but not in memory. Experiment 2 showed that participants did generally follow task demands to shift their bias some, but this shift was not predicted by cognitive ability. This study shows that further research is needed to examine individual differences in response bias as one way to account for what has previously been treated as noise.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7275/9467068.0

Share

COinS