Publication Date
2014
Journal or Book Title
Biomaterials
Abstract
Tumor progression is coincident with mechanochemical changes in the extracellular matrix (ECM). We hypothesized that tumor stroma stiffening, alongside a shift in the ECM composition from a basement membrane-like microenvironment toward a dense network of collagen-rich fibers during tumorigenesis, confers resistance to otherwise powerful chemotherapeutics. To test this hypothesis, we created a high-throughput drug screening platform based on our poly(ethylene glycol)-phosphorylcholine (PEG-PC) hydrogel system, and customized it to capture the stiffness and integrin-binding profile of in vivo tumors. We report that the efficacy of a Raf kinase inhibitor, sorafenib, is reduced on stiff, collagen-rich microenvironments, independent of ROCK activity. Instead, sustained activation of JNK mediated this resistance, and combining a JNK inhibitor with sorafenib eliminated stiffness-mediated resistance in triple negative breast cancer cells. Surprisingly, neither ERK nor p38 appears to mediate sorafenib resistance, and instead, either ERK or p38 inhibition rescued sorafenib resistance during JNK inhibition, suggesting negative crosstalk between these signaling pathways on stiff, collagen-rich environments. Overall, we discovered that β1integrin and its downstream effector JNK mediate sorafenib resistance during tumor stiffening. These results also highlight the need for more advanced cell culture platforms, such as our high-throughput PEG-PC system, with which to screen chemotherapeutics.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.058
Pages
5749-5759
Volume
35
Issue
22
Recommended Citation
Nguyen, Thuy V.; Sleiman, Marianne; Moriarty, Timothy; Herrick, William G.; and Peyton, Shelly, "Sorafenib resistance and JNK signaling in carcinoma during extracellular matrix stiffening" (2014). Biomaterials. 851.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.058
Abstract.docx (11 kB)
References.docx (18 kB)
Figure Captions.docx (16 kB)
Figure 1.tif (33259 kB)
Figure 2.tif (52368 kB)
Figure 3.tif (67575 kB)
Figure 4.tif (72251 kB)
Figure 5.tif (62697 kB)
Figure 6.tif (20053 kB)
Supplemental Figure 1.tif (8939 kB)
Supplemental Figure 3.tif (36131 kB)
Supplemental Figure 2.tif (17766 kB)
Supplemental Figure 4.tif (9107 kB)