Files
Download Data (439 KB)
Publication Date
2021
Keywords
Biological invasions, Geographic bias, Invasive plant, Ailanthus altissima, Alliaria petiolata, Bromus tectorum, Lonicera maackii, Lythrum salicaria, Microstegium vimineum, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis, Reynoutria japonica, Tamarix ramosissima
Disciplines
Biodiversity | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Environmental Sciences | Other Environmental Sciences | Plant Sciences | Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology | Weed Science
Description
Data collected from English-language articles published between 1999-2018 on the ten most studied invasive plants in the United States.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/m1an-m171
Grant/Award Number and Agency
Funding provided from the Fonds de Recherche Nature et Technologie Québec, the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station and the Department of Environmental Conservation under Project No. MAS00033, and by Grant No. G19AC00091 from the U.S. Geological Survey and a Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center graduate fellowship awarded to L. Munro.
Recommended Citation
Munro, Lara; Griffin, Bridget; Laginhas, Brittany; and Bradley, Bethany, "Data for « Does invasion science encompass the invaded range? A comparison of the geographies of invasion science versus management in the U.S. »" (2021). Data and Datasets. 118.
https://doi.org/10.7275/m1an-m171
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/data/118
Included in
Biodiversity Commons, Other Environmental Sciences Commons, Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons, Weed Science Commons
Comments
Readme included in .zip file.