Data for « Does invasion science encompass the invaded range? A comparison of the geographies of invasion science versus management in the U.S. »
Download Data

Download Data (439 KB)

Publication Date

2021

Keywords

Biological invasions, Geographic bias, Invasive plant, Ailanthus altissima, Alliaria petiolata, Bromus tectorum, Lonicera maackii, Lythrum salicaria, Microstegium vimineum, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis, Reynoutria japonica, Tamarix ramosissima

Disciplines

Biodiversity | Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Environmental Sciences | Other Environmental Sciences | Plant Sciences | Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology | Weed Science

Description

Data collected from English-language articles published between 1999-2018 on the ten most studied invasive plants in the United States.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7275/m1an-m171

Grant/Award Number and Agency

Funding provided from the Fonds de Recherche Nature et Technologie Québec, the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, the Massachusetts Agricultural Experiment Station and the Department of Environmental Conservation under Project No. MAS00033, and by Grant No. G19AC00091 from the U.S. Geological Survey and a Department of Interior Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center graduate fellowship awarded to L. Munro.

Comments

Readme included in .zip file.

Data for « Does invasion science encompass the invaded range? A comparison of the geographies of invasion science versus management in the U.S. »

Share

COinS