Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.
Non-UMass Amherst users, please click the view more button below to purchase a copy of this dissertation from Proquest.
(Some titles may also be available free of charge in our Open Access Dissertation Collection, so please check there first.)
Estimating the prevalence of lead exposure among western Massachusetts construction workers
Despite the known health hazards associated with exposure to lead, occupational lead poisoning remains a health problem. Although a variety of public health programs have been implemented to control this exposure, knowledge of which occupational groups are at greatest risk is incomplete. This research developed and applied a lead risk model that generated estimates of lead-using industries and numbers of employees potentially exposed to lead, and then, validated the model through a lead exposure prevalence survey among construction workers. The lead risk model was developed using data from the National Occupational Exposure Survey, state lead registries, lead inspection results from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other sources. The model was applied to Massachusetts County Business Patterns and Department of Employment and Training databases to produce state and county estimates of numbers of employees potentially exposed to lead, and lead-using companies, ranked by exposure risk. The sensitivity of the state lead registry was evaluated using estimates from this model. To validate the model, a prevalence survey of lead exposure was conducted among a sample of 127 western Massachusetts plumbers. Based on the model, an estimated 1% (20,825) of Massachusetts employees are potentially exposed to lead, 53% are at moderate or high risk of lead exposure, and 74% work within a 5 contiguous-county area in eastern Massachusetts. There are 3,448 lead-using facilities, representing 2% of total companies. The model also showed a high sensitivity (70%) for state regulated construction groups within the lead registry, but low sensitivities for all other construction industries. The geometric mean for blood lead and zinc protoporphyrin among plumbers in the prevalence survey were 7.0 $\mu$g/dl and 30.9 $\mu$g/dl, respectively, indicating relatively low levels of lead exposure. Current smokers, smoking at the workplace, and hand scraping metal were associated with higher lead levels, while wearing protective equipment at work was associated with lower levels. The model identified non-traditional lead-using industries, thus, potentially allowing the state to better target educational and medical intervention activities to reduce the risk of occupational lead exposure. Similar lead-reduction activities can be applied to other states that adopt the model.
Public health|Occupational safety
McDonald, Margaret, "Estimating the prevalence of lead exposure among western Massachusetts construction workers" (1997). Doctoral Dissertations Available from Proquest. AAI9809368.