Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.

Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.

Date of Award

9-2013

Document Type

Campus Access

Degree Name

Doctor of Education (EdD)

Degree Program

Psychometric Methods, Education Statistics and Research Methods

First Advisor

Lisa A. Keller

Second Advisor

Stephen G. Sireci

Third Advisor

Bruce C. Skaggs

Subject Categories

Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an eighth grade state-level math assessment contained items that function differentially (DIF) for English Learner students (EL) as compared to English Only students (EO) and if so, what factors might have caused DIF. To determine this, Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis was employed. Subsequently, a Mixture Item Response Theory Model (MIRTM) was fit to determine why items function differentially for EL examinees. Several additional methods were employed to examine what item level factors may have caused ELs difficulty. An item review by a linguist was conducted to determine what item characteristics may have caused ELs difficulty; multiple linear regression was performed to test whether identified difficult characteristics predict an item's chi-squared values; and distractor analysis was conducted to determine whether there were certain answer choices that were more attractive to ELs. Logistic regression was performed for each item to test whether the student background variables of poverty and first language or being an EL predicted item correctness. The DIF results using Lord's Chi-Squared test identified 4 items as having meaningful DIF >0.2 using the range-null hypothesis. Of those items, there were 2 items favoring the EO population that were identified as assessing the Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability strand of the state Math Standards. As well, there were 2 DIF items that favored the EL population that were identified as assessing the Number Sense and Operations strand of the state Math Standards. The length of the item as judged in the item review supported several items that were identified as DIF. The Mixture IRT Model was run using 3 conditions. It was found that with all three conditions, the overall latent class groupings did not match those of the manifest groups of EO and EL. To probe further into the results of the latent class groupings, the student background variables of poverty, language proficiency status or first language spoken were compared to the latent class groupings. In looking at these results, it was not evident that these student background variables better explain the latent class groupings.

Share

COinS