Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.

Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.

Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9542-3871

Document Type

Campus-Only Access for Five (5) Years

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Program

Political Science

Year Degree Awarded

2019

Month Degree Awarded

September

First Advisor

Sonia E. Alvarez

Subject Categories

Comparative Politics | Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies | Latin American Languages and Societies | Political Theory

Abstract

What kind of politics emerges under dire conditions of violence and precarity in the context of transit migration across Mexico? How is sanctuary practiced and gendered? This dissertation analyzes a range of experiences of transit and sanctuary practices of hospitality, care and solidarity, particularly those of marginalized women, nonbinary individuals, and grassroots movements that reveal an emerging pattern of transnational citizenship from below. As a defining issue of the 21stcentury, international migrations have provided an occasion for the rebirth of virulent forms of nationalist citizenship both from above and below, and the expansion of the coercive functions of the state. In the Americas, masses of displaced and dispossessed people cross international borders exposing themselves to the most perilous journeys throughout Mexico en routeto the United States. This dissertation sheds light on how civil society in Mexico has hastened to respond to the pressing needs of mobile populations, precipitated by a binational deportation regime that returns people to the poorest and most violent countries in the Western hemisphere. While the literature has privileged the (receiving) state as paradigmatic locus of power, and its institutional and geographical span as the main political domain, I argue for a notion of “citizenship in transit” that posits transit as a stark time-space within which the dispute to define the parameters and participants of citizenship unfolds. Taking “encounter” as a level of analysis, I shift the focus away from “foreigner” or “citizen” as identities and legal statuses, and direct attention instead to practice, to how people “do” citizenship. My study builds on data collected during fifteen months of ethnographic fieldwork involving participant observation and in-depth interviews with sanctuary workers, asylum seekers, undocumented migrants, volunteers, activists, lawyers, humanitarian personnel, and government officials in Mexico and Central America. My core argument is two-fold. In a material sense, transit becomes an enduring time-space wherein the multiplication of agents and sites of government undermine the rights of citizenship for everyone. As a set of political practices, “citizenship in transit” denotes how ordinary people re-invent citizenship beyond the legal designation and the epistemological framework of the nation-state.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7275/5bv5-b104

Available for download on Sunday, September 01, 2024

Share

COinS