Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.

Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.

Author ORCID Identifier

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4860-6592

Document Type

Open Access Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Program

Environmental Conservation

Year Degree Awarded

2020

Month Degree Awarded

September

First Advisor

Chris Sutherland

Subject Categories

Biodiversity | Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology | Population Biology | Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology

Abstract

This dissertation was motivated by a desire to understand the effects of habitat degradation and urbanization on a single species in a single study system in western Massachusetts, the red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus), but along the way unexpected conceptual and methodological hurdles caused the work to grow into a multi-species, multi-region, and multi-scale endeavor. As I designed my dissertation research and began considering approaches to quantifying heterogeneity and human influence in my study landscape, I recognized inconsistencies in methods used to define and quantify landscape metrics, particularly in urban systems. To investigate further, I conducted a critical review of the literature to describe the current practices of landscape quantification in urban systems and to identify any patterns or trends. The review highlighted the fact that variability among definitions of ‘urban’ stems from inconsistent decision making around a set of core principles in landscape ecology, and I used these to establish a standardizing framework for landscape gradient quantification. I then applied this framework to 10 ecologically distinct metro-regions across the United States and revealed a consistent pair of gradients that offer an updated multi-dimensional perspective of landscape heterogeneity that intuitively advances the one-dimension perspective dominating exiting approaches to studying ecological responses across gradients of human influence. Having developed a framework for gradient definition, and extending the single-axis lens through which ecological enquiry is made, I applied these approaches to first investigate environmental drivers of avian community size and structure, and second, to critically evaluate the validity of the red-backed salamander as an indicator for biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes.

Inconsistencies in definitions of “urbanization” are commonly attributed to the lack of general theory describing ecosystem function in urban landscapes. In Chapter 1, I review the literature on urban landscape quantification to identify patterns and best practices that could improve the process by which urban landscape gradients are defined and quantified. This review of 250 research articles revealed striking methodological consistency that aligns with the best practices of gradient definition in landscape ecology, these are: (1) selection of features to represent the urban landscape, (2) identification of associated spatial data to characterize these features, and (3) selection of an ecologically appropriate spatial scale. However, the review also highlighted apparent inconsistencies in urban gradient definition that arise from ad-hoc and ambiguous decision making at each of these stages, and demonstrated that ecologically justified and transparent decision making can standardize gradient definition and contribute to improved understanding of ecosystem processes in human-dominated landscapes (Padilla & Sutherland, 2019). In Chapter 2, I address the lack of standardized heterogeneity metrics that can be used to jointly measure multi-regional ecological responses that has hindered the generalization of urban stressors on ecological communities. I coupled the transparent methodological framework developed in Chapter 1 with a multivariate statistical analysis of land use data to quantify landscape structure in 10 medium sized cities representing the dominant ecoregions of the United States to determine whether consistent and biologically meaningful landscape metrics emerge across spatial domains. This work revealed two dominant axes of spatial variation that are intuitively consistent with the characteristics of human-dominated landscape mosaics but are overlooked when defining landscapes along a single axis of variation. In the context of representative landscapes in the United States, these gradients describe variation in the characteristic physical (soft to hard) and natural (brown to green) structure of landscapes influences by human activity. To develop the ecological relevance of the dual-axis landscape definition, I explored the response of American robin (Turdus migratorius) occupancy to these gradients across the 10 cities. This case study demonstrated that robins generally respond similarly and strongly to both landscape axes and that a multi-dimensional perspective reveals ecological nuance that may otherwise be overlooked.

In Chapter 3, I apply the concepts developed in the previous two chapters to my study system in western Massachusetts. I tested two leading theories regarding how habitat fragmentation in human-dominated landscapes impacts species communities: island biogeography theory, and spatial heterogeneity. In the case of island biogeography, I expected species diversity to linearly decline as the degree of fragmentation and human-modification to the landscape increased, whereas, spatial heterogeneity would result in a quadratic response where species diversity is greatest in moderately disturbed landscape mosaics. These hypotheses were evaluated with data on the bird communities collected at 42 sites in a 3-year field study that were analyzed using a hierarchical model that allows for estimation of site-specific abundance of each species and species richness while simultaneously accounting for imperfect detection. This analysis revealed a strong non-linear community response to both axes of the multi-dimensional landscape (soft-hard and brown-green) that suggested increased heterogeneity promotes higher species abundance as well as species richness. At the species level, there was variation that corresponded with variation in known habitat preferences and life history traits. These results suggest that variation in species richness follows expectations of the spatial heterogeneity hypothesis that predicts greatest diversity in moderately disturbed landscape mosaics. I hypothesize that this process results from a greater diversity of habitat types available in landscape mosaics, and greater structural complexity within forest fragments that are characteristic of heterogenous mosaics.

Finally, in Chapter 4 I provide a rare empirical assessment of the indicator species concept. Specifically, I evaluate the red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus) as an indicator of forest biodiversity in human-dominated landscapes. During my 3-year field study, in addition to avian community data, I collected occurrence and abundance data for trees, soil invertebrates and red-backed salamanders at each of the 42 sites. These data were analyzed using a joint-species distribution model to evaluate the salamander’s indicator potential under the premise that species within a community will generally exhibit a shared response to gradients of human influence, and that an ideal indicator species represents an exemplar of the shared community response. I compared this novel approach to indicator species selection with a commonly used metric for identifying indicator species. Despite the frequency with which salamanders are promoted as indicators of forest condition, my results provided no evidence that they are effective indicators for biodiversity based on established conceptual underpinnings of indicator species. As with the avian community, biodiversity showed a non-linear response to the dual axes of human influence where richness is highest in heterogenous landscape. Species that were identified as candidate indicators were species characteristic of edge habitat and dense forests which are common in human-dominated landscape mosaics.

In summary, my dissertation provides much needed methodological improvements to landscape gradient quantification in human-dominated systems and demonstrates the applicability of this framework both at a national scale, as demonstrated across the United States, and the local scale as demonstrated in my field system in Western Massachusetts. This framework results in a multi-dimensional perspective of landscape heterogeneity that extends does a better job of representing complex landscapes beyond single-axis measures that confound two intuitive gradients of human influence. I have demonstrated how such a multi-dimensional perspective sheds light on the processes driving the landscape scale patterns of biodiversity and can be used to build evaluate process-based conceptual models for identifying indicator species. In doing so, this work presents a standardizing framework for landscape gradient quantification in human dominated landscapes, an identification of the existence of unifying measures of human influence, and a demonstration of how coupling this approach and a multi-dimensional perspective offers an general framework for understanding spatial variation in ecological communities that exist in human dominated landscape mosaics.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7275/b75f-vp70

Share

COinS