Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.

Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.

Author ORCID Identifier


Open Access Dissertation

Document Type


Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Program


Year Degree Awarded


Month Degree Awarded


First Advisor

Arindrajit Dube

Second Advisor

Suresh Naidu

Third Advisor

Deepankar Basu

Fourth Advisor

Jasmine Kerrissey

Subject Categories

Growth and Development | Income Distribution | Labor Economics


In several countries, wages have stagnated and union membership declined, even as productivity has increased. The established view of employers helpless to the labor market's invisible hand has increasingly come under question. Attention has turned towards the power of employers to set wages; yet only recently have the data required to investigate this – observing workers at their employers – become available, and then mostly in richer countries.

My first chapter, “Monopsony in Movers” (co-authored with Arindrajit Dube and Suresh Naidu), proposes a new credible estimation strategy to measure employer monopsony power. We build on the idea that employers with more power can pay lower wages without workers quitting. Using administrative data from Oregon, USA, we compare the quit rates of similar workers who leave the same firm at the same time but land at differently paying new firms. We find that monopsonistic competition is pervasive, even in low-wage, high-turnover sectors.

My second chapter, “Firms and Inequality When Unemployment is High”, investigates employer power using tax data from South Africa. Previously, developing countries received marginal attention in this literature. I find that firm wage policies explain a larger share of wage inequality in South Africa than in richer countries. I estimate that this is driven by higher productivity dispersion, and employer monopsony power, which is in turn linked to higher unemployment. These firm-level dynamics may exacerbate inequality in developing countries more generally, which share similar characteristics.

My third and main chapter, “Collective Bargaining and Spillovers in Local Labor Markets”, considers wage-setting institutions under monopsonistic competition. My model predicts that non-covered firms “close” to collective bargaining firms will increase their wages in tandem with wage agreements. I propose a model-consistent and empirically rich measure of “close” firms, the flow of workers between them, which captures firm strategic interaction. I test my hypotheses across a decade of wage agreements. Observed wages in collective bargaining firms follow sharp increases in prescribed wages, and indeed firms “closer” to bargaining councils increase wages more than firms further away. A microdata simulation suggests that spillovers double the intensive and extensive margin effects of collective bargaining agreements on the full wage distribution.


Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.