Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.
Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.
Author ORCID Identifier
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9613-7667
AccessType
Open Access Dissertation
Document Type
dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Degree Program
Education
Year Degree Awarded
2023
Month Degree Awarded
September
First Advisor
Christine Smith
Second Advisor
Sangeeta Kamat
Third Advisor
Laura Valdiviezo
Fourth Advisor
Brenda Bushouse
Subject Categories
Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education | Central American Studies | Education Policy | Language and Literacy Education | Nonprofit Studies | Public Policy | Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies
Abstract
The dynamics of nongovernmental organizations (NGO) working in Guatemala can be understood as processual, evolving with and being shaped by social and cultural events in Guatemala and around the world. Central to understanding these dynamics is NGOs’ historical relationship to the State, which has ranged from collaborative to homicidal. However, as the number and activity of NGOs increase globally and in Guatemala, specifically within the education sector, some scholars characterize them less by their opposition to the State and more by their provision of education and myriad affiliations with the State.
The purpose of this dissertation is to situate and then analyze debutant INGO participation in a State-sponsored education program. This dissertation presents and then draws upon the conceptualization of NGOtenango in Guatemala, specifically exploring debutant INGO participation in the national reading program, a multi-stakeholder partnership for education (MSPE) called Leamos Juntos (Let’s Read Together). Then, this dissertation investigates factors that support and/or hinder debutant INGO participation along with strategies for increasing supportive factors and decreasing barriers to INGO participation. I employ a comparative and multi-sited case study approach with a focus on three debutant INGOs and three different public education departments in Guatemala.
This case study suggests that there are specific supportive factors and barriers to debutant INGO participation in Leamos Juntos. The conclusions lay out a series of supportive factors and barriers for debutant INGO participation in Leamos Juntos along with strategies to reduce barriers and increase supportive factors. The findings highlight and show how different factors—specific to the INGOs, departments, schools, the Leamos Juntos program itself, existing challenges in the education system, and the phenomenon of NGOtenango—affect how participation takes shape. Furthermore, the ways in which debutant INGOs appropriate policy can affect how local schools engage in that policy. The findings also show how public education staff and INGO staff view participation and collaboration differently and, at times, at odds with each other. This case study provides granular detail of how debutant INGOs and public education staff navigate decision-making around INGO participation in Guatemala and provides guidance for practice and policy.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/35971888
Recommended Citation
Carter, Jacob A., "The puzzle of debutant INGO participation in Guatemala’s National Reading Program Leamos Juntos: A comparative and multi-sited case study" (2023). Doctoral Dissertations. 2965.
https://doi.org/10.7275/35971888
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/2965
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Included in
Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Central American Studies Commons, Education Policy Commons, Language and Literacy Education Commons, Nonprofit Studies Commons, Public Policy Commons, Quantitative, Qualitative, Comparative, and Historical Methodologies Commons