Session B8 - Effect of Upstream Fish Passage Structure Entrance Design and Head Differential on Attraction and Entry of Adult American Shad

Location

UMass Amherst

Event Website

http://fishpassage.ecs.umass.edu/Conference2012/

Start Date

7-6-2012 1:30 PM

End Date

7-6-2012 1:50 PM

Description

Physical and hydraulic characteristics of upstream fish passage structures (e.g., fishways, fish lifts) are critical for effective attraction and entry of target species to be passed. These characteristics may be species specific, but have not been extensively quantified. We evaluated attraction and entry of adult American shad and lake sturgeon to experimental surface and submerged orifice entrance structures at several entrance head differential (water velocity) and siting (center of channel, side of channel) conditions, under controlled laboratory conditions. Initial attraction of American shad to both entrance types was relatively rapid under all conditions and was highest for the lowest test entrance velocity . For surface weirs, attraction rate appeared to decrease with increasing head differential. American shad entered surface weirs preferentially over orifices; head differential appeared to have no effect on orifice attraction rate of American shad. Lake sturgeon appeared to be more attracted to surface weirs than orifices at the lowest head differential; attraction to orifices and surface weirs at the higher head differential was roughly equivalent. Sturgeon appeared to display no preference for entry via surface weirs or orifices, but overall proportion of fish passing was low, which may have limited statistical precision of results. Both species appeared to show little preference for either center or side entrances, except that American shad strongly selected the side surface weir at the 0.30 m differential. Results from this study show a degree of interplay between attraction and passage for various entrance configurations and hydraulic conditions. Depending on species, one particular combination of factors may elicit strong attraction, but only modest passage.

Comments

Dr. Alex Haro is a Research Ecologist at the S.O. Conte Anadromous Fish Research Laboratory (U.S. Geological Survey) at Turners Falls, Massachusetts, USA and serves as a Principal Investigator and Section Leader of the Fish Passage Engineering Section at the Conte Lab. His present work involves migratory fish behavior, design, engineering, and evaluation of fish passage structures, fish swimming performance, and ecology and management of American eels. Dr. Haro provides extensive basic and applied research and advice to state, national, and international agencies, NGOs, and the private sector on fish passage technology and operations. He is also an Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Conservation and serves as a major advisor for graduate students, as well as an instructor for courses in fisheries biology

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Jun 7th, 1:30 PM Jun 7th, 1:50 PM

Session B8 - Effect of Upstream Fish Passage Structure Entrance Design and Head Differential on Attraction and Entry of Adult American Shad

UMass Amherst

Physical and hydraulic characteristics of upstream fish passage structures (e.g., fishways, fish lifts) are critical for effective attraction and entry of target species to be passed. These characteristics may be species specific, but have not been extensively quantified. We evaluated attraction and entry of adult American shad and lake sturgeon to experimental surface and submerged orifice entrance structures at several entrance head differential (water velocity) and siting (center of channel, side of channel) conditions, under controlled laboratory conditions. Initial attraction of American shad to both entrance types was relatively rapid under all conditions and was highest for the lowest test entrance velocity . For surface weirs, attraction rate appeared to decrease with increasing head differential. American shad entered surface weirs preferentially over orifices; head differential appeared to have no effect on orifice attraction rate of American shad. Lake sturgeon appeared to be more attracted to surface weirs than orifices at the lowest head differential; attraction to orifices and surface weirs at the higher head differential was roughly equivalent. Sturgeon appeared to display no preference for entry via surface weirs or orifices, but overall proportion of fish passing was low, which may have limited statistical precision of results. Both species appeared to show little preference for either center or side entrances, except that American shad strongly selected the side surface weir at the 0.30 m differential. Results from this study show a degree of interplay between attraction and passage for various entrance configurations and hydraulic conditions. Depending on species, one particular combination of factors may elicit strong attraction, but only modest passage.

https://scholarworks.umass.edu/fishpassage_conference/2012/June7/13