•  
  •  
 

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Abstract

As geoprocessing on the web has matured in recent years, an increasing number of geoprocessing services and functionality are becoming available in the form of online Web Processing Services (WPS). Consequently, the quality of such geoprocessing services is of importance to ensure that WPS instances fulfill users’ expectations. In this paper, we illustrate, and discuss initial results from a quantitative analysis of the performance of WPS servers. To do so, we used two test scenarios to measure response time, response size, throughput, and failure rate of five WPS servers including 52 Degree North, Deegree, GeoServer, Py- WPS, and Zoo. We also assess each WPS server in terms of qualitative metrics such as software architecture, perceived ease of use, flexibility of deployment, and quality of documentation. A case study addressing accessibility assessment is used to evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of each implementation, and point to challenges experienced while working with these WPS servers.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7275/R5PG1PXB

Included in

Geography Commons

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.