Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.
Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.
ORCID
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1857-4550
Access Type
Open Access Thesis
Document Type
thesis
Degree Program
Political Science
Degree Type
Master of Arts (M.A.)
Year Degree Awarded
2021
Month Degree Awarded
February
Abstract
Over forty years ago, Hanna Pitkin expressed concern that social scientists were failing to give concepts the attention which they needed (Pitkin 1972, 277). This thesis takes up the same theme, asking how the concept of responsiveness is treated by political scientists. The goal to reveal confusion that surrounds widely used concepts such as responsiveness. The analysis offered in this thesis has significance for the discipline of political science in three ways. First, it highlights confusion surrounding the concept of responsiveness itself. Responsiveness is a widely utilized concept employed throughout the social sciences; however, as this thesis shows, there is wide disagreement in how the concept is understood. This confusion is fueled by the frequent failure of scholars to critically analyze the concept and the assumptions which have been attached to the understanding of responsiveness. Second, by analyzing the related concepts of representation and democracy, this thesis suggests that there is a lack of attention to concepts which are employed for research that extends beyond responsiveness. Many other concepts that are foundational to our discipline warrant increased scrutiny. Third and finally, the thesis highlights the danger of ignoring the ideological commitments of political scientists, commitments that can shape in hidden but consequential ways how we study the world around us.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7275/20667047
First Advisor
Frederic Schaffer
Second Advisor
Timothy Pachirat
Recommended Citation
Beck, Joshua, "Responsiveness, Representation, and Democracy: A Critical Conceptual Analysis and its Implications for Political Science" (2021). Masters Theses. 1004.
https://doi.org/10.7275/20667047
https://scholarworks.umass.edu/masters_theses_2/1004
Included in
American Politics Commons, Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, Models and Methods Commons, Other Political Science Commons, Political Theory Commons