Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.
Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.
Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.
Open Access Thesis
Master of Science (M.S.)
Year Degree Awarded
Month Degree Awarded
People’s ability to call an experienced item “old” and a novel item “new” is recognition memory. Recognition memory is usually studied by first asking participants to learn a list of words and then make judgments of old (studied) or new (not studied) for test words. It has long been debated whether the underlying process of recognition memory is continuous or discrete. Two types of models are compared specifically that assume either discrete or continuous information states: the 2-high threshold (2HT) model and the unequal variance signal detection (UVSD) model, respectively. Researchers have used the receiver operation characteristic (ROC) function and response time (RT) data to test between the two models. However, both methods have provided evidence for 2HT and UVSD, and the debate has not come to consensus. In this study, we used an alternative approach to look into this issue. After studying the words, participants first made “old/new” judgment for each single test item. Then, if there were falsely identified items, each of them was randomly paired with a correctly identified word of the same response. Participants were asked to choose the studied word from the word pair. Simulation and experimental results were able to discriminate the 2HT and UVSD model. Experimental results showed that the UVSD model fitted the data better than the 2HT model. The forced-choice test paradigm provided an effective way to test between the 2HT and UVSD models.
Dr. Jeffrey J. Starns
Ma, Qiuli, "Testing Recognition Memory Models with Forced-choice Testing" (2019). Masters Theses. 746.