Milam, JoanCunningham-Minnick, MichaelRoberts, Henry PatrickBuelow, ChristopherKing, David I.2024-04-262023-08-042022-01-01https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12690https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14394/37725Forest management is often practiced to enhance conditions for wildlife, including native bees. Evaluations of the effects of forest management on bees have shown that abundance and diversity are higher in newly created early-successional conditions. To date, studies have restricted sampling to the forest understory; however, recent research finds that bee abundance is as high or higher in forest canopies than in understories, suggesting that previous observations of substantially greater bee abundance and diversity in recently managed areas could be an artifact of incomplete sampling of the vertical gradient within forests. To examine the potential implications of sampling biases associated with the failure of previous studies to include canopy samples in comparisons of managed and unmanaged forests, we sampled bees within a recently harvested forest as well as the understory and canopy of adjacent unmanaged forest. Bee abundance and diversity were an order of magnitude higher in managed areas compared to the unmanaged forest, even when understory and canopy samples were combined. These results suggest that not sampling the canopy is inconsequential with respect to the broadly reported conclusion that managed areas support more abundant and diverse bee communities than surrounding forest cover.UMass Amherst Open Access Policyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/abundanceApoideabarrensblue vane trapcanopyforestrichnessEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental SciencesNatural Resources and Conservationarticle