Off-campus UMass Amherst users: To download campus access dissertations, please use the following link to log into our proxy server with your UMass Amherst user name and password.

Non-UMass Amherst users: Please talk to your librarian about requesting this dissertation through interlibrary loan.

Dissertations that have an embargo placed on them will not be available to anyone until the embargo expires.

Author ORCID Identifier

N/A

AccessType

Campus-Only Access for Five (5) Years

Document Type

dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Degree Program

Sociology

Year Degree Awarded

2018

Month Degree Awarded

September

First Advisor

Robert Zussman

Second Advisor

Amy Schalet

Third Advisor

Janice Irvine

Fourth Advisor

Donald Tomaskovic-Devey

Subject Categories

Sociology

Abstract

This dissertation explores the tension between the rise of the anti-bullying movement and the persistent marginalization of LGBTQ, low income, and racial minority youth in U.S. schools. Today, all 50 states have passed anti-bullying laws and most schools have anti-bullying policies in place to protect youth from conflict, yet there is minimal data on the outcomes of these initiatives on school communities. Drawing on two years of fieldwork at a rural high school in the Northeast, social media observations, 127 interviews, and analysis of bullying reports and prevention strategies, I examine these outcomes and how they shape adolescent relationships. I find that while teens’ bullying practices routinely police gender and sexuality norms and target marginalized youth, the initiatives designed to prevent bullying do not address the larger inequalities that motivate and structure teen conflicts. Instead, they individualize bullying and emphasize tolerance. I argue that anti-bullying’s “culture of tolerance” reinforces existing gender, class, sexual, and racial hierarchies among youth, and makes bullying more diffuse and difficult to manage. While these campaigns may appear successful on the surface, particularly among privileged students, they often obscure the processes by which inequality is maintained in school settings, and inadvertently produce inequalities themselves. Ultimately, I find that youth have more effective anti-bullying strategies, collectively going beyond tolerance to use social media as a site for resistance, recognition, and diversity education.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.7275/12722606

Share

COinS