Publication:
Session A9: To Fill or Not to Fill: Stream Simulation and Embedded Aquatic Organism Passage Structures

dc.contributor.authorGubernick, Robert
dc.contributor.authorCenderelli, Dan
dc.contributor.authorWeinhold, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, Dale
dc.contributor.authorKozarek, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorMielke, Sara
dc.contributor.departmentUSDA Forest Service
dc.contributor.departmentUSFS Stream System Technology Center
dc.contributor.departmentUSFS White River National Forest
dc.contributor.departmentUSFS Cheq-Nicolet National Forest
dc.contributor.departmentSt. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Lab Univ. of MN.
dc.contributor.departmentSt. Anthony Falls Hydraulic Lab Univ. of MN.
dc.coverage.locationGroningen, The Netherlands
dc.coverage.temporal2015-06-24T17:15:00-07:00
dc.coverage.temporal2015-06-24T17:00:00-07:00
dc.date2023-09-23T12:47:32.000
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-26T17:08:40Z
dc.date.available2024-04-26T17:08:40Z
dc.date.issued2015-06-24
dc.description<p>Presenting Author Bio: Bob is the watershed restoration geologist for the Eastern region of the US Forest service and a principal of the Washington Office Virtual AOP design team. He has been a practicing AOP and stream restoration design for 30 years in Alaska and across the National Forest system. He was the 2014 recipient of the Career Achievement Award for Distingushed Service in Fish Passage at the International conference on engineering and ecohydrology for fish passage.</p>
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Throughout North America stream simulation and embedded / recessed culverts are used to facilitate the passage of aquatic organisms thru road stream crossings. Although the concept of naturelike streambeds inside these structures is widely embraced, the design methodology and construction practice varies widely between state and federal agencies. Much debate has occurred with one specific requirement, whether or not to place stream bed material inside these structures. Not placing bed material inside structures assumes on going sediment transport processes will fill the structure’s interior with streambed materials. This is assumed to be a cost saving measure from both a design and implementation standpoint. Recent research, monitoring, and historic installations provide evidence that not placing streambed material can produce deleterious effects to the stream and aquatic habitat, cause low flow barriers, may not retain bed material, and potentially cause long term structural failure. Conversely in some channel types or site condition infilling may not be necessary and produce satisfactory results. Casual mechanism of success and failure, stream impacts, and design considerations will be discussed along with recommendations for site specific conditions where infilling structures is required or allowing structures to fill naturally would be successful.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14394/25184
dc.relationhttp://fishpassage.umass.edu/
dc.relation.urlhttps://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1722&amp;context=fishpassage_conference&amp;unstamped=1
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.subjectAquaculture and Fisheries
dc.subjectHydraulic Engineering
dc.titleSession A9: To Fill or Not to Fill: Stream Simulation and Embedded Aquatic Organism Passage Structures
dc.typeevent
dc.typeevent
digcom.contributor.authorGubernick, Robert
digcom.contributor.authorCenderelli, Dan
digcom.contributor.authorWeinhold, Mark
digcom.contributor.authorHiggins, Dale
digcom.contributor.authorKozarek, Jessica
digcom.contributor.authorMielke, Sara
digcom.identifierfishpassage_conference/2015/June24/6
digcom.identifier.contextkey7362531
digcom.identifier.submissionpathfishpassage_conference/2015/June24/6
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A9.5_Robert_Gubernick.pdf
Size:
9.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format