Publication:
Pilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcAslan, Devon
dc.contributor.authorArevalo, Farah Najar
dc.contributor.authorKing, David A.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Thaddeus R.
dc.contributor.departmentChalmers University of Technology
dc.contributor.departmentArizona State University
dc.contributor.departmentArizona State University
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
dc.date2023-09-24T07:52:21.000
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-26T20:23:11Z
dc.date.available2024-04-26T20:23:11Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractPilot projects have emerged in cities globally as a way to experiment with the utilization of a suite of smart mobility and emerging transportation technologies. Automated vehicles (AVs) have become central tools for such projects as city governments and industry explore the use and impact of this emerging technology. This paper presents a large-scale assessment of AV pilot projects in U.S. cities to understand how pilot projects are being used to examine the risks and benefits of AVs, how cities integrate these potentially transformative technologies into conventional policy and planning, and how and what they are learning about this technology and its future opportunities and risks. Through interviews with planning practitioners and document analysis, we demonstrate that the approaches cities take for AVs differ significantly, and often lack coherent policy goals. Key findings from this research include: (1) a disconnect between the goals of the pilot projects and a city’s transportation goals; (2) cities generally lack a long-term vision for how AVs fit into future mobility systems and how they might help address transportation goals; (3) an overemphasis of non-transportation benefits of AV pilots projects; (4) AV pilot projects exhibit a lack of policy learning and iteration; and (5) cities are not leveraging pilot projects for public benefits. Overall, urban and transportation planners and decision makers show a clear interest to discover how AVs can be used to address transportation challenges in their communities, but our research shows that while AV pilot projects purport to do this, while having numerous outcomes, they have limited value for informing transportation policy and planning questions around AVs. We also find that AV pilot projects, as presently structured, may constrain planners’ ability to re-think transportation systems within the context of rapid technological change.
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01006-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14394/43715
dc.relation.ispartofHumanities & Social Sciences Communications
dc.relation.urlhttps://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=spp_faculty_pubs&unstamped=1
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.source.issue8
dc.source.statuspublished
dc.titlePilot project purgatory? Assessing automated vehicle pilot projects in U.S. cities
dc.typearticle
dc.typearticle
digcom.contributor.authorMcAslan, Devon
digcom.contributor.authorArevalo, Farah Najar
digcom.contributor.authorKing, David A.
digcom.contributor.authorMiller, Thaddeus R.
digcom.identifierspp_faculty_pubs/3
digcom.identifier.contextkey27301826
digcom.identifier.submissionpathspp_faculty_pubs/3
dspace.entity.typePublication
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s41599_021_01006_2.pdf
Size:
626.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Thumbnail Image
Name: s41599_021_01006_2.pdf
Size: 626.46 KB
Kind: Adobe PDF
Collections
Public Policy and Administration Faculty Publications